http://www.roanoke.com/editorials/wb/254516Editorial: Cap and trade and Boucher
The incumbent from coal country did vote for it -- and did weaken it considerably.
Republican challenger Morgan Griffith is calling Rep. Rick Boucher deceitful in a campaign ad that mentions the Ninth District congressman's role in House-passed energy legislation.
It is Griffith, though, who misleads when complaining that Boucher's ad suggests the 14term Democrat "opposed coal-killing cap-and-trade legislation, when he in fact voted for it." The ad suggests no such thing.
Boucher did vote for the American Clean Energy and Security Act, now stalled in the Senate, which includes a cap-and-trade mechanism for reducing carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels, such as coal. The congressman doesn't deny this.
His ad says he "took on his own party to protect coal jobs in the energy bill." And he did -- to the dismay of many environmentalists.
Boucher was a key player in shaping the energy bill in ways that protect coal interests at the cost of slowing and weakening efforts to curb heat-trapping greenhouses gases, such as carbon dioxide, that contribute to global warming.
One example: The bill's most vilified provision, cap and trade, would cap carbon emissions, but mitigate the impact on the economy by providing coal-dependent industries with tradeable emissions allowances. Boucher made that far more coal-friendly than environmentalist backers wanted it to be.
Originally, the legislation would have required industries to buy the allowances at auction, with proceeds to go into clean-energy research. Boucher was credited with -- or, depending on one's priorities, blamed for -- working to change the bill to give electric utilities 90 percent of their emissions allowances free. His objective, he said at the time, was to keep coal production up and electric rates down.
Whether any of this ever happens is anybody's guess. The Senate has yet to act on an energy bill, which might look a whole lot or nothing like the House version. Thus far, cap and trade has had zero impact on coal jobs, electric bills -- on anything, except this year's congressional campaigns.
Boucher did vote for it, and he "took on his own party" to weaken its clean energy provisions substantially. Both can be true, and, in fact, both are.